//
1 min read

Loss and Damage Fund Negotiations Stalemated Over Location of Facility

Negotiations by countries at the fourth and final meeting of the UN Transitional Committee on Loss and Damage in Aswan, Egypt, on Thursday, October 19, 2023, ended in deadlock over key differences.

The Transitional Committee mandated with designing the new Loss and Damage Fund has only a day remaining to formally conclude the talks. Countries remain divergent on fundamental issues to operationalize the Loss and Damage fund.

These include issues around location, governance arrangements of the fund, sources of funding, and eligibility issues, among others.

Developed countries, led by the United States, have insisted that the new Loss and Damage Fund should be set up under the World Bank as a hosted financial intermediary fund (FIF). Under such an arrangement, the World Bank would set up the Secretariat and provide related Secretariat services for the new fund against a fee and following the conclusion of a negotiated agreement.

Given the tightening of guidelines in recent years (2019 and 2022), the Loss and Damage Fund would operate under different arrangements than those of the Adaptation Fund and the Global Environment Facility (GEF).

This has raised serious concerns about restricted access to and the legal independence, flexibility, and decision-making power of the new fund.

Ambassador Pedro L. Pedroso Cuesta, Chair of the Group of the 77 and China, briefed the media about the state of play, the united position taken by developing countries, and the challenges to find a way forward.

He expressed concerns about the inability of a fund under the World Bank to provide legal independence, legal personality, accountability to the Conference of Parties (COP) and CMA processes, and respond with speed to emergency events.

Dare Akogun

Dare Akogun is a media innovator, strategic communication professional, and climate and energy transition journalist with over 11 years of impactful contributions to the media industry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Previous Story

NATO 2% Spending Goal Could Divert $2.6tr From Climate Finance by 2028 – Report

Next Story

COP 15: Delegates to UN Biodiversity Convention Moves From Agreement to Action